Tet Happened, and No One Cared

This is a very interesting column from Frank Rich of the New York Times, on the latest happenings of Iraq and how warped a view of Iraq that Mr. McCain has. I'll post the last 2 paragraphs, as they are key:

“We’re succeeding,” Mr. McCain said after his last trip to Iraq. “I don’t care what anybody says.” Again, it’s the last sentence that’s accurate. When General Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker testify before Congress again this week — against the backdrop of a million-Iraqi, anti-American protest called by Mr. Sadr — Mr. McCain will ram home all this “success” no matter the facts.
The difference between the Democrats and Mr. McCain going forward is clear enough: They want to find a way out of the morass, however provisional and imperfect, and he equates staying the disastrous course with patriotism. Mr. McCain’s doomed promise of military “victory” in Iraq is akin to Wile E. Coyote’s perpetual pursuit of the Road Runner, with much higher carnage. This isn’t patriotism. As the old saying goes, doing the same thing over and over again and hoping you’ll get a different result is the definition of insanity.

That quote from McCain, if nothing else, symbolizes the true hubris of his campaign, as well as the current occupants of the White House. Like any religious or ideological fanatic, they won't let any number of facts, no matter how substantial or overwhelming, get in the way of what they want to believe.

But I do disagree with Mr. Rich on something, and that's his attack on Obama and Clinton for distorting what McCain said about our forces occupying Iraq for the next hundred years. What he really said was that he'd want our forces being based in Iraq, like they are in Japan and South Korea. That is, as long as they weren't being attacked, or wounded, or killed. First of all, even thinking there's a possibility that our forces could have a benign presence in Iraq is absurd. It's delusional. Those other 2 countries, as well as the others in which we've had long-term presences are, weren't fracationized, Balken-like states like Iraq is. They don't have angry Muslims (be it Shiite, Shia, Sunni, whatever) pissed off at us for turning their land into a big fiefdom. Second, even if this was a possible scenario, is it something that's really desirable? Even a military presence in a country free of war like Japan, I'm sure, is pretty expensive. Finances aside, isn't our presence all over the world giving these groups the ammuniation they need to raise the money and the followers that they require to plan attacks against us?

So, to break it down, attacking the two candidates for distorting what McCain said is grasping at straws, as what he actually said is no better. He'll be Bush III, with a foreign policy that'll be "Bush on steroids", as Buchanan said.

No Rights for Airline Passengers

This is a very good article from John Dean, who was President Nixon's lead counsel. It discusses how as a passenger on an airplane, your rights are non-existent. There are stories, including one from Mr. Dean personally, of people being detained on these airplanes for hours (in one case, it was a 9-hour wait). There's no requirement for these airlines to provide waste service, food and beverages, or electricity. There are groups filing suit in courts and calling for a passengers' bill of rights. So far, this has met with resistance by Republican courts, who'll always side with big business. Another factor is 9/11. Prior to that day, Congress was holding hearings on this very issue.

The number of people involved in these incidents who have actually voiced their complaints publicly or have sued has been very few, surprising considering that there are probably thousands out there. I have been on a few flights, after 9/11, and I'm very thankful that I've never had to go through that kind of experience. I really don't understand how, when these people are being detained, they can just sit there and at best, complain about it. Having to sit in that kind of suffocating atmosphere, bunched up with people, I'd go nuts. I really don't know how these people could have endured.

And You Think We're Fat?

For quite a few years now, there's been talk here and there about how many of us here in the U.S. are overweight, if not obese. We love our fatty fast foods, and picking them up at the drive through in our cars. So we're not walking, exercising, we're eating crap food, and we have a weight epidemic. But there's one country that's not far behind, and may even surpass us as the most obese nation, and that's our neighbor to the north, Mexico.

Due to the influx of processed food that's entered the country and its supermarkets, 71 percent of Mexican males are overweight, with 66 percent of females. In addition, diabetes is now Mexico's leading cause of death.

What I noticed in this article, is that around 20 years ago, the rate of overweight Mexican adults was less than 10 percent. So it's increased by 6 or 7 times in 2 decades. Of course, the purveyors of fast food and "liquid candy", like McDonald's, KFC, and Pepsi, play a huge part in this. But I also feel a monumental shift has occured, not just in Mexico, but in the U.S. and possibly other parts of the world as well. In that 20 years ago, in Mexico, the experts were concerned with hunger. Poverty and hunger went hand-in-hand in those days, and it no doubt still does in some cases. However, you can go to any poor neighborhood in the United States, be it in Mississippi, California or New York, and see people who are significantly overweight, or even obese.

Because it's become easy for people to get their hands on this shit, this garbage. It's pre-made, processed, and it's cheap. Look at the prices of more healthier fare, vegetables and organic food. Are these kinds of stores even in poor neighborhoods? Forgive me, I'm not an expert on this subject by any stretch, I just find it interesting that I see plenty of fat people, be they rich or poor. The only bone-thin people I see are the ones who want it that way, like teenaged girls and celebs.

Sadr calls for a million person march against U.S. occupation

As this occupation of Iraq has taken root and has deepened, I've just gotten more and more confused. I can't keep track of the players, what their interests are, I don't know the length of Iran's involvement, I'm not clear on what "The Awakening" is. In a just war, it should always be clear who are the white hats and who are the black hats.

Last week, there was a battle that took to the streets, between Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki and the Iraq forces, trained by the U.S., and a Shiite cleric, Sadr, and his legion of followers, concentrated in the city of Basra. Despite the assistance of the U.S. military, Maliki's forces were only able to fight to a standstill with those of Sadr's. After behind-the-scenes politicking that apparently involved Iran, Sadr called a truce, and that's proceeded to put quite a bit of egg on Maliki's face.

That's basically what's been going on. And now Sadr has called for a march of a million strong on the city of Najaf, to coincide with the 5th anniversary of our invasion of Iraq. Here is what the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker, said about it in a briefing:

"If his intention is to get a whole lot of people together and go and make trouble in Najaf, I don't think that is going to be very popular".

It's telling that after the WMD hoax was exposed for the fraud that it was, Bush and co. began to emphasize how we had to invade Iraq to get rid of the dictator and to give freedom and democracy for the Iraqi people. But when a popular cleric organizes a march that could draw a very large crowd of Iraqis who oppose our presence there, he's getting "a whole lot of people together to go and make trouble."

Interview with Jesse Ventura on Larry King

I had no idea that Ventura was on Larry King; I don't tend to watch King's show. But I found it on Youtube, it's in six parts, and here they are for your viewing. I heartily recommend it, as no one can really be as blunt as Jesse Ventura when it comes to our political system. I was your typical apolitical teenager, and Ventura's candidacy for the governorship of Minnesota, and his subsequent victory, helped turn that around. He does indeed have some alternative, even dangerous ideas (to the status quo elite anyway), and his lack of hestitation in outlining those ideas, and expressing them proudly, certainly opened my eyes.

I do recommend reading his two books, "I Ain't Got Time to Bleed" (his autobiography) and "Do I Stand Alone?" (a treatise on his views on many political issues). He also has a new book out, "Don't Start the Revolution Without Me", that I fully plan to read at the first opportunity. This is a very good interview, the only part I'm very unhappy about is that King (or his producers) felt the need to have the talking head pundits on during the last third of the program. The interview was going great, I was learning a lot, and it got torpedoed by these know-nothing asses who were spouting the line of their respective party. But then again, that might have been the intention all along. You can't let a man like Ventura speak his mind for too long.

Musings on a Wednesday Evening

I don't know, just lately, now and then I'm up to blogging not on a particular issue or on something I find on the 'net, but things that I witness while living my life. Like today. Today, I went on a trip with several people in the Legal Society at the college I attend, to the court in Islip. In a way, I really wasn't up to going, as it's criminal court and I'm looking to go into civil law. But at least one of my courses is giving extra credit, and it's not like I have anything better to do with my day.

The first thing I see is this cavalcade of cars and trucks, there had to be close to 10 of them. They were the vehicles of students going on this trip. No one was carpooling; the lady I went with offered, but only two students (I was one of them) took her up on it. Not that I had much of a choice, as anyone who knows me can attest to. But I got a first-hand glimpse of how wasteful we are. I'm a firm believer in global warming, and that we have to come together and act immediately. On top of that, you have gas heading towards $3.50 a gallon, and it'll soon be $4. By joining together and maybe taking, say, 3 or 4 cars instead of 9 or 10, that makes a huge difference when it comes to the amount of gas that we use and that we have to spend the next time we fill up. And of course, it's good for the environment too. I think it's rooted in this belief of independence that we seem to have, and that we're somehow ceding it if we accept or look for the help of others. Don't worry, we're not going to turn into socialists if we ride with someone.

The court was okay. I always feel a little uncomfortable when I go to one, as you have to go through a metal detector and stuff. Several colleagues had to take off their shoes. It just feels so militarized, I guess you'd put it. Police everywhere. I guess you have to expect it in a court. A teacher who also works in the court, I'm not sure what his exact title is, he handles the prisoners, he talked to us for a good half hour before giving us the tour. He was talking a lot about the American system of law and how superior it is to most other places in the world. I did feel that he's a little too idealistic, that our system does fail us and is in fact raping the Constitution daily, but I admired his energy.

We were in a courtroom to hear some of the arraignments. I couldn't really hear that much, but one thing I did hear, and which gave me a laugh, was when this homeless black man was brought before the judge. The judge was reading from the police report, I guess, and he read that this guy said to the arresting officer when he was approached, "I'm just minding my own business, man. I'm smoking crack." You can't make this up, lol.

After that, we went to Applebee's for lunch. I'll never be good with groups. I felt uncomfortable, and Denise (the lady who drove us) teased me about it on the way home. I don't know, I don't have problems with expressing my feelings and some secrets, my opinions, on a virtual contraption like this one. But I do a total 180 in a group setting. I'm shy, quiet, reserved. I took it harder when I was younger. I always got depressed and felt they were just ignoring me. But I probably come off as a boring guy. As I've gotten older, I've learned to accept it. I have a quote that I use as my email signature, from Einstein: "I live in the solitude which is painful in youth, but delicious in the years of maturity." It does taste a little delicious, because I value the time I have to learn and enrich my mind. I have been after friendship and more for a long time, and I feel that if it were to come to me now, I wouldn't know what to do with it. So maybe it just wasn't meant for me. Not all of us can get along easily with people and have people like them.

If you have Sirius, you should listen to Ron Silver's show on channel 110 from 9 to 11. He's an actor, you've probably seen him, but he's also very asute and intelligent, and knows a lot about world affairs and politics. I don't agree with a lot of what he says, but he comes across as being very reasoned and has a measured tone; not like the typical talk radio people like Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck, who have this tone of "I know everything, and you have to listen to what I say." He even has people like Phil Donahue on and actually lets them speak; he doesn't yell over them every 2 seconds.

Anyway, have a good night, and as Ron Silver says at the end of every show, try to appreciate the beauty in each day and look for that silver lining in the sky.

Forget the snow, listen to the oilman from Houston

This post from Bru Notes gives a good look at the latest updates on the global warming issue; specifically, that studies show that the American West is the warmest place on the planet, and getting warmer. Also, no less than the president of Shell Oil recently stated that "the debate is over"; global warming is real. When Shell Oil's saying that global warming is real, it's time for the few holdouts to pack up their tents.